Better questions about your agent workflow.
Start with whether the work was verified and accepted. Then inspect effort, observed failures, and human corrections to choose your next experiment.
Verified.
Accepted.
Both checks matter.
- Objective verification
- Passed
- Human acceptance
- Yes
- Observed failed tools
- 2
- Monetary cost
- Unavailable
Clarify the failed tool’s usage instructions, then compare the next similar task.
Sample evidence, not a customer result or measured improvement.
A practical review for everyday coding.
Use the same evidence whether you are shipping a fix, improving a workflow, or evaluating instructions.
- Review real agent tasks
- See verification and acceptance together
- Keep detailed evidence local
- Understand repeated rework
- Test clearer instructions
- Build evidence before changing the stack
- Compare similar tasks manually
- Record the configuration used
- Keep unsupported cost claims out
Change one thing at a time.
Keep the host, task family, verification policy, and other settings stable. Compare similar work and include failures and rework, not just the fastest accepted result.
Capture a task
Start in the right Git repository and work on a real, bounded coding task.
Verify and review
Run an objective check and explicitly accept, reject, or partially accept the result.
Test one change
Use the recommendation to guide the next similar task. Compare outcomes before drawing conclusions.
Make the next task a useful experiment.
Capture the evidence, verify the result, and decide what to try next.